HR 956referred119th Congress

Aerial Firefighting Enhancement Act of 2025

Introduced Feb 4, 2025Last action Mar 7, 2025Sponsor: Dan Newhouse(R-WA)

defenseArmed Forces and National Security

Ask about this Build timeline Compare Export source pack

Open in Network Lab Trace connections

Lobbying Filings

$34.6M

Total Lobbying Spend

Suspicious Trades

Members Involved

Timeline

Jan 24, 2025trade

Gilbert Ray Cisneros, Jr. bought K

Jan 24, 2025trade

Gilbert Ray Cisneros, Jr. bought K

Feb 4, 2025bill

Bill introduced

Apr 8, 2025trade

Robert P. Bresnahan, Jr. bought K

Apr 8, 2025trade

Robert P. Bresnahan, Jr. bought K

Apr 16, 2025lobbying

Lobbying filed by PERIMETER SOLUTIONS

Lobbying Activity

Registrant	Client	Amount	Filed	Period	Issues
COLLECTIVE STRATEGIES & COMMUNICATIONS	PERIMETER SOLUTIONS	$9.0M	Jul 15, 2025	2025Q2	CHM
AMERICAN FAMILY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, S.I.	AMERICAN FAMILY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, S.I.	$8.6M	Jul 1, 2025	2025Q1	DISINSTAX
COLLECTIVE STRATEGIES & COMMUNICATIONS

Suspicious Trading Activity

Congress members who traded stocks in companies connected to lobbying on this bill, within 90 days of its introduction date.

Member	Party	Ticker	Company	Trade	Date	Amount	Timing	Lobbying Client	Conflict
Gilbert Ray Cisneros, Jr.	D	K	K	Buy	Jan 24, 2025	$1,001 - $15,000	11d before	10 TANKER AIR CARRIER LLC	1%
Gilbert Ray Cisneros, Jr.	D

Conflict Summary

6 trades by 2 members of Congress in companies connected to lobbying on HR 956. The average conflict score is 20%.

Gilbert Ray Cisneros, Jr. (4 trades)Robert P. Bresnahan, Jr. (2 trades)

Methodology: Bill-Lobbying-Trade Connection

CapitolExposed identifies the "bill-lobbying-trade pipeline" by: (1) finding lobbying filings (LD-2) that specifically mention this bill, (2) matching lobbying clients to publicly traded companies, and (3) finding stock trades by members of Congress in those companies within 90 days of the bill's introduction date. Trades made before the bill was introduced are highlighted in red, as they may indicate advance knowledge. This analysis surfaces correlations worthy of scrutiny; it does not prove wrongdoing.