HR 982introduced119th Congress

Warriors to Workforce Act

Introduced Feb 5, 2025House billPolicy area: Armed Forces and National SecurityLast action Feb 24, 2026Sponsor: Derrick Van Orden(R-WI)

defenseArmed Forces and National Security

Economic Opportunity SubcommitteeVeterans' Affairs Committee

Ask about this Build timeline Compare Export source pack

Official Congress record Open in Network Lab Trace connections

Lobbying Filings

$28.3M

Total Lobbying Spend

Suspicious Trades

Members Involved

Timeline

Feb 5, 2025bill

Bill introduced

Apr 15, 2025lobbying

Lobbying filed by DISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS

Jul 14, 2025lobbying

Lobbying filed by DISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS

Official Congressional Actions

Feb 24, 2026Committee

Forwarded by Subcommittee to Full Committee by Voice Vote.

Economic Opportunity Subcommittee

View official action

Feb 24, 2026Committee

Subcommittee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held

Economic Opportunity Subcommittee

View official action

Jan 21, 2026Committee

Subcommittee Hearings Held

Economic Opportunity Subcommittee

View official action

Mar 7, 2025Committee

Referred to the Subcommittee on Economic Opportunity.

Lobbying Activity

Registrant	Client	Amount	Filed	Period	Issues
DISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS	DISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS	$14.1M	Jul 14, 2025	2025Q2	VET
DISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS	DISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS	$14.1M	Apr 15, 2025	2025Q1	VET

Suspicious Trading Activity

Congress members who traded stocks in companies connected to lobbying on this bill, within 90 days of its introduction date.

No suspicious trade-lobbying connections found for this bill.

Methodology: Bill-Lobbying-Trade Connection

CapitolExposed identifies the "bill-lobbying-trade pipeline" by: (1) finding lobbying filings (LD-2) that specifically mention this bill, (2) matching lobbying clients to publicly traded companies, and (3) finding stock trades by members of Congress in those companies within 90 days of the bill's introduction date. Trades made before the bill was introduced are highlighted in red, as they may indicate advance knowledge. This analysis surfaces correlations worthy of scrutiny; it does not prove wrongdoing.