Eric's Law This bill modifies procedures with respect to capital sentencing hearings. If a jury at a capital sentencing hearing does not reach a unanimous recommendation on the defendant's sentence and there is a motion by the attorney for the government, the court must order a new special sentencing hearing and impanel a new jury. If the new jury at the special sentencing hearing does not reach a unanimous recommendation on the defendant's sentence, then the court is prohibited from imposing a death sentence.
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Bill introduced
Lobbying filed by AMERICAN FED OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES AFL-CIO
Lobbying filed by AMERICAN FED OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES AFL-CIO
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
| Registrant | Client | Amount | Filed | Period | Issues |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMERICAN FED OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES, AFL-CIO | AMERICAN FED OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES AFL-CIO | $590.0K | Jul 30, 2025 | 2025Q2 | CIVDEFDOC |
| AMERICAN FED OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES, AFL-CIO | AMERICAN FED OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES AFL-CIO | $540.0K | Apr 21, 2025 | 2025Q1 | AGRBUDCIV |
The lobbying table lists Senate LDA quarterly reports (LD-2) that cite this bill by number and cover a quarter of the 119th Congress. An LD-2 names a bill as “H.R. 1234” with no Congress, so a report on another Congress, which can only concern a different bill with the same number, is left out, even when it was filed after this Congress began. The amount is what the registrant reported for the whole filing, across every issue on it, not spending on this bill. Official actions and the bill summary come from Congress.gov, and votes from the roll-call record. This page no longer pairs the bill with members' stock trades: matching lobbying clients to traded companies by name, and trades to a bill by date, is not something the records establish.