HighNeeds corroborationR-UTRepresentative

Blake D. Moore

Investigation of Blake D. Moore (R-UT) identified 2 finding(s) across 2 categories: offshore_connection, contract_conflict. Overall severity: high.

Generated Mar 2, 2026Updated Mar 8, 20262 findings

View Full Profile

Blake D. Moore (R-UT)

Findings(2)

#1Offshore ConnectionProbable

2 Cross-Reference Matches

Cross-referencing Blake D. Moore's network against international databases returned 2 potential matches across 2 source(s). - EXACT: 1 match(es) — Blake D. Moore Score: 100% Datasets: us_congress, ann_pep_positions (100% confidence)
- FUZZY: 1 match(es) — ICIJ officer "MOORE" matches member via alias "b. moore" (75% confidence) Note: FinCEN matches are at the institutional level only and do not imply individual wrongdoing. ICIJ matches indicate entity name similarity and require further investigation to confirm actual connections.

#2Contract ConflictNeeds corroboration

5 Potential Government Contract Conflicts

Name matching between government contracts and Blake D. Moore's trading activity identified 5 potential overlap(s). These matches suggest the member may have traded in companies receiving federal contracts. - Contract: RTX CORPORATION (Department of Defense, $8,688,654,907) — Member traded RTX on 2024-01-19
- Contract: RTX CORPORATION (Department of Defense, $7,911,304,631) — Member traded RTX on 2024-01-19
- Contract: RTX CORPORATION (Department of Defense, $7,498,943,172) — Member traded RTX on 2024-01-19
- Contract: RTX CORPORATION (Department of Defense, $4,865,962,076) — Member traded RTX on 2024-01-19
- Contract: RTX CORPORATION (Department of Defense, $3,648,685,783) — Member traded RTX on 2024-01-19 Note: Name matching is approximate. Further investigation is needed to confirm actual connections between contract recipients and traded companies.

Methodology & Disclosure

This dossier was generated by CapitolExposed's analysis engines. All claims are derived from cross-referencing publicly available government records: STOCK Act filings, Senate lobbying disclosures (LDA), FEC campaign finance reports, Congressional voting records, ICIJ Offshore Leaks data, and FARA foreign agent registrations.

Conflict scoring: Each finding incorporates up to five weighted signals: committee jurisdiction overlap (30%), vote timing proximity (25%), lobbying connections (20%), donation connections (15%), and trade size anomaly (10%).

Important: CapitolExposed does not allege wrongdoing. Findings reflect statistical patterns in public data, not legal conclusions. Offshore leak matches are name-based and may include false positives.

Investigation Report

This dossier assembles signals from public records and linked source material. All claims cite specific filings or evidence items. CapitolExposed does not allege wrongdoing. If you find an error or believe information is inaccurate, please report an error.

← All Dossiers Blake D. Moore's Profile →Cross-Reference Database →Watchdog Report →