HRES 488passed_one119th Congress

Denouncing the antisemitic terrorist attack in Boulder, Colorado.

Introduced Jun 9, 2025House billPolicy area: Crime and Law EnforcementLast action Jun 9, 2025Sponsor: Gabe Evans(R-CO)

legalCrime and Law Enforcement

Judiciary Committee

Ask about this Build timeline Compare Export source pack

Official Congress record Open in Network Lab Trace connections

Lobbying Filings

Undisclosed

Total Lobbying Spend

Suspicious Trades

Members Involved

Timeline

Jun 9, 2025bill

Bill introduced

Jun 9, 2025vote

Pete Aguilar voted nay

Jun 9, 2025vote

Rick W. Allen voted yea

Jun 9, 2025vote

Jodey C. Arrington voted not_voting

Official Congressional Actions

Jun 9, 2025Floor

On motion to suspend the rules and agree to the resolution Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 280 - 113, 6 Present (Roll no. 158). (text: CR H2542)

View official action

Jun 9, 2025IntroReferral

Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

Judiciary Committee

View official action

Jun 9, 2025Floor

Mr. Van Drew moved to suspend the rules and agree to the resolution.

View official action

Jun 9, 2025IntroReferral

Submitted in House

View official action

Lobbying Activity

No lobbying filings found mentioning this bill.

Suspicious Trading Activity

Congress members who traded stocks in companies connected to lobbying on this bill, within 90 days of its introduction date.

No suspicious trade-lobbying connections found for this bill.

Votes on This Bill

Member	Party	Position	Date
Pete Aguilar	D	nay	Jun 9, 2025
Rick W. Allen	R	yea	Jun 9, 2025
Jodey C. Arrington	R	not_voting	Jun 9, 2025
Mark Alford	R	yea	Jun 9, 2025

Methodology: Bill-Lobbying-Trade Connection

CapitolExposed identifies the "bill-lobbying-trade pipeline" by: (1) finding lobbying filings (LD-2) that specifically mention this bill, (2) matching lobbying clients to publicly traded companies, and (3) finding stock trades by members of Congress in those companies within 90 days of the bill's introduction date. Trades made before the bill was introduced are highlighted in red, as they may indicate advance knowledge. This analysis surfaces correlations worthy of scrutiny; it does not prove wrongdoing.