HRES 1009passed_one119th Congress

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 6945) to amend part A of title IV of the Social Security Act to clarify the authority of States to use funds for pregnancy centers, and for other purposes; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 6359) to require institutions of higher education to disseminate information on the rights of, and accommodations and resources for, pregnant students, and for other purposes; and providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 140) providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management relating to Public Land Order No. 7917 for Withdrawal of Federal Lands; Cook, Lake, and Saint Louis Counties, MN.

Introduced Jan 20, 2026House billPolicy area: CongressLast action Jan 21, 2026Sponsor: Austin Scott(R-GA)

governmentCongress

Rules Committee

Ask about this Build timeline Compare Export source pack

Official Congress record Open in Network Lab Trace connections

Official summaryUpdated Jan 21, 2026

What the bill does

Sets forth the rule for consideration of the bill (H.R. 6945) to amend part A of title IV of the Social Security Act to clarify the authority of States to use funds for pregnancy centers, and for other purposes; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 6359) to require institutions of higher education to disseminate information on the rights of, and accommodations and resources for, pregnant students, and for other purposes; and providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 140) providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management relating to Public Land Order No. 7917 for Withdrawal of Federal Lands; Cook, Lake, and Saint Louis Counties, MN.

Latest official action

Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

Lobbying Filings

Undisclosed

Total Lobbying Spend

Suspicious Trades

Members Involved

Timeline

Jan 20, 2026bill

Bill introduced

Jan 21, 2026vote

Brad Knott voted yea

Jan 21, 2026vote

Teresa Leger Fernandez voted nay

Jan 21, 2026vote

Zoe Lofgren voted nay

Official Congressional Actions

Jan 21, 2026Floor

Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H1138-1139)

View official action

Jan 21, 2026Floor

POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on H. Res. 1009, the Chair put the question on ordering the previous question and by voice vote, announced the ayes had prevailed. Mr. McGovern demanded the yeas and nays and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.

View official action

Jan 21, 2026Floor

Considered as privileged matter. (consideration: CR H1131-1138)

View official action

Jan 21, 2026Floor

Passed/agreed to in House: On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by recorded vote: 213 - 210 (Roll no. 35). (text: CR H1131-1132)

View official action

Lobbying Activity

No lobbying filings found mentioning this bill.

Suspicious Trading Activity

Congress members who traded stocks in companies connected to lobbying on this bill, within 90 days of its introduction date.

No suspicious trade-lobbying connections found for this bill.

Votes on This Bill

Member	Party	Position	Date
Brad Knott	R	yea	Jan 21, 2026
Teresa Leger Fernandez	D	nay	Jan 21, 2026
Zoe Lofgren	D	nay	Jan 21, 2026
Frank D. Lucas	R	yea	Jan 21, 2026

Methodology: Bill-Lobbying-Trade Connection

CapitolExposed identifies the "bill-lobbying-trade pipeline" by: (1) finding lobbying filings (LD-2) that specifically mention this bill, (2) matching lobbying clients to publicly traded companies, and (3) finding stock trades by members of Congress in those companies within 90 days of the bill's introduction date. Trades made before the bill was introduced are highlighted in red, as they may indicate advance knowledge. This analysis surfaces correlations worthy of scrutiny; it does not prove wrongdoing.